http://www.chessclub.org/news.php?n=374
2) Chess
Charivari
One great untapped resource for those wishing to research chess events from
the past are chess columns in local newspapers. Today you will not find many in
North America but
100 years ago there were a great number (easily over 60) appearing throughout
the continent and even 50 years ago there were quite a few. More and more
newspapers are posting their archives online and have search capabilities that
spare the hunt in the dark pouring over blurry microfilm that was the only way
to get things done in the past. Also very useful in the quest is Ken Whyld's
massive Chess Columns: A List, a 587 page book that makes a very good
stab at trying to record as much information about as many columns as possible.
As Whyld wrote in his introduction in a work of this kind there were bound to be
many errors and omissions.
One column you will not find listed in Chess Columns: A List ran
in the Winnipeg Tribune from October 31, 1953 to June 19, 1954. The 33
columns that appeared focused primarily on international news, but national and
local events were also covered. A typical column featured a chess problem, news
and one or two annotated games - often in great depth. Books reviews and the
occasional photo rounded things out. Chess Charivari,
as Dr. Nathan Divinsky called his column, was meaty and well written but that
didn't stop it from being dropped in the summer of 1954. The Winnipeg
Tribune gave the case as low readership - in a poll commissioned by the
paper out of 120 readers there were only three regular and six occasional
readers of Chess Charivari!
Divinsky received a total of $160 for his work on his column that deserved a
better fate.
The following excerpt gives a small taste of the good stuff to be found
in Chess Charivari.
Much of the information to be found in it is unavailable elsewhere.
Chess
Charivari
by Dr. Nathan Divinsky
Feb 20, 1954
Reshevsky Simultaneous
This event proved to be a highlight in Winnipeg chess.
The most enjoyable chess evening fans have had for many years. Dr. W. W. Wright,
president of the Manitoba Chess Association
introduced the grandmaster.For the first 15 minutes Reshevsky answered questions
from the floor, explaining that he would very much like to get Botvinnik ALONE
in a match for the world's championship! Then the play began.
Thirty three Winnipeg
stalwarts opposed the grandmaster. Having participated ourselves, we can assure
our readers that his opening play was faultless, that his speed was phenomenal,
and after an hour, a half dozen players had already suffered defeat. The middle
game was played at a more reasonable rate. It is here that the grandmaster is at
a disadvantage - he does not have sufficient tie to consider all the
combinations, whereas the individual player has a bit more time and peace.
Several players obtained an advantage, some in position and a few in material.
However as more and more fell away, and the ranks were thinned to ten, Reshevsky
seemed to be coming around at breakneck speed - and one MUST move when he
comes!The difficult part was over, and after only 3 hours of play, 31 had gone
down to defeat. Only your editor and Mr. Abe Kussim obtained draws. We expect to
hear more of Mr. Kussim in Winnipeg
chess.
Though Winnipeg's result compares with Calgary (33
losses and 1 draw) and Vancouver (33
loses and 4 draws), we feel that a much stronger group of players could have
participated,. With players like Mogle, Blinder, A. Dreman, B. Deitchman, H.
Frank and M. Desser in the line-up we are convinced that several wins would
have been scored. To say nothing of I. J. Dreman and H. Yanofsky. Not only would
they themselves have had good chances, but they would have helped slow up
Reshevsky and given all the others more time to think. We sincerely hope that
the next generation of A players will take a more sincere interest and give all
chess enthusiasts pleasure and enjoyment. We were happy to see many young and
talented players in the line-up.
There were a great number of spectators (close to 100) and they all seemed
to be having a wonderful time.
Besides your editor and Mr. Kussim, the following players
participated:
E. Budnitsky, C. F. Ashmore, A. Boxer, P. H. Buhr, T. F. Carter, S. F.
Cooper, S. Choslovsky, A. D. Divinsky, J. Enns, B. Fortier, J. Filkow, N.
Garfinkle, L. Guberman, P. Hildebrandt, K. Knapheus, N. Klassen, P. Katz, W.
Krawitz, G. Love, W. R. Mitchell, H. R. MacKean, J. L. Matynia, R. Newbury, J.
J. Promislow, S. Pedlar, B. Richman, J. Steigerwald, P. Sidney, J. Shebaylo, A.
Vincent, Dr. W. W. Wright.
Reshevsky -
Divinsky
Winnipeg
(simul) 1954
[Divinsky]
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6
I was
all set to play the 1...e5, the Budapest Defense,
hoping that the complications of the pawn sacrifice would give me some sort of a
chance, but D.A. Yanofsky convinced me that playing solidly was the only hope.
3.Nc3 Bg7 4.e4 d6 5.Nf3 0–0 6.Be2 Nbd7 7.0–0 e5 8.Re1 c6 9.Bf1 Ne8 10.Bg5
f6 11.Be3 Nb6 12.Qd2 Be6 13.b3 f5 14.Ng5 Bd7
15.exf5?
Up to
this point the game has followed a reasonable pattern. The text is an oversight,
which I must admit I was very happy to see.
15...exd4! 16.fxg6
Now if
16.Bxd4 Bxd4 17.Qxd4 Qxg5 and Black is a piece up.
16...dxc3?
There
was no hurry to take the piece. Simply 16...hxg6 and White's game is hopeless.
Now White gets compensation for the piece.
17.gxh7+ Kh8 18.Qe2 Nf6 19.h3 Qe8 20.Qd3 Qe5 21.f4 Qa5 22.Bd4 Bf5 23.Qxc3
Qxc3 24.Bxc3 Nxh7 25.Bxg7+ Kxg7 26.Re7+ Kg8 27.Rd1 Nxg5 28.fxg5 Rab8 29.g4!
Not
29.Rxd6 because of 29...Nc8 winning the
exchange.
29...Bc2 30.Rd2 Bb1 31.Re1 Bh7 32.Rxd6 Rbd8 33.Rh6 Bc2 34.c5 Nd5 35.Bc4
Kg7 36.Re2 Bb1 37.Kh2 Rde8 38.Rxe8 Rxe8 39.Bxd5 cxd5 40.Rd6
Re7
At this
point things were moving very quickly and I didn't want to gamble on 40...Be4
41.Rd7+ Kg6 42.Rxb7 Rd8 43.c6 d4 44.Rd7!
41.Rxd5 Bxa2 42.Rd3 a5 43.Kg3 Rc7 44.h4 Kg8
If
44...Rxc5 45.Rd7+; but 44...Kf8 would have saved some time.
45.Kf4 Kf8 46.h5 Rxc5 47.Rd8+ Ke7 48.Rb8 Rc7?
Much
stronger is 48...Rb5
49.h6 Bb1
These
pawns seem to be growing in size!
50.Rg8 Rc6 51.h7 Bxh7 52.Rg7+ Kf8 53.Rxh7 Rb6 54.Rh3 Kg7 55.Kf5
Here I
refused an offer of a draw.
55...Rb5+ 56.Kf4 Rb4+ 57.Kf5 b5 58.Rc3 a4 59.Rc7+ Kg8 60.Kg6 Kf8 61.bxa4
bxa4 Draw
If there
are any winning chances, White has them now. An exciting
struggle.
A Sam Loyd problem, Geller-Flohr and
Petrosian-Smyslov from the 19th USSR Championship (the first without notes and
the second heavily annotated) and a review of R. N. Coles The Chess-Player's
Weekend Book completed this
column.
No comments:
Post a Comment